System Boundary, Dependencies and Baseline Review questions System Boundary, Dependencies and Baseline — Integrated Summary Food-water resilience assessment starts by naming the people and period covered and tracing the paths from water source through grower, store, market and household. An administrative city boundary is insufficient when food enters from outside or local washing depends on water inside it. Each baseline measure needs a numerator, denominator, unit and subgroup; a household-order rate is not a vehicle-trip count. Dependency mapping shows how one pump failure can affect washing and storage together, without double-counting a consequence. Before selecting an intervention, examine missing records: an unlogged delivery is not necessarily a zero, and a dispatched box is not a household receipt. Participants help set the mandate and challenge disputed facts while the record names decision authority and absent voices. The transferable output is a boundary map, reproducible indicator table and evidence-gap register. Fictional figures support practice, not claims about a real city.
Review questions Test your understanding with these questions. Marking and saved results are available with a free account.
Question 1 Ready boxes enter the town market from outside while local washing stops. Should the outside supplier be excluded from the boundary map? Yes; anything outside the administrative line is irrelevant No; show a boundary inflow with amount, period and continuity uncertainty Question 2 A market has one hundred sales and a committee records eighty served households in a week. Is 100/80 household coverage? No; sales and households are different units, and eligible and served household counts are needed Yes; a result above one hundred percent proves every household is covered Question 3 A washing pump fails, but the market has two days of usable stock. Does the fault establish late household service today? Yes; any pump fault immediately stops household receipts No; check reserve duration and allocation before inferring a household outcome Question 4 Ten distribution records have no final status. Should all ten be coded as zero receipts? No; separate unknown from failure, verify receipts and use a bound if needed Yes; coding zero is conservative even when households may have received boxes Question 5 One neighborhood delegate attends a meeting while evening-shift workers are absent. Does attendance establish consent of the whole area? Yes; the attendance sheet closes objections from absent workers No; record representation limits and offer a timely objection route that can affect the decision Question 6 Pumping resumes before the reserve tank empties while the truck road remains closed. Does washing still stop under the original scenario? No; revise the washing branch while still tracing the road constraint Yes; once both hazards occur every projected consequence is fixed Question 7 Thirty vehicles use an exposed road and an area has fifty households. Is 30/50 the household exposure rate? Yes; each vehicle represents one household by definition No; trips are not households, so a documented route-to-household link is needed Question 8 Two renting households differ: one has two days of safe storage, the other none. Should tenure alone give them the same vulnerability rating? No; include verified storage and alternatives in the rating Yes; renting alone fully determines vulnerability Question 9 Impact is four and likelihood three on ordinal scales. Is their product twelve a measured monetary expected loss? Yes; multiplication turns the ordinal scores into money No; it is a ranking index needing rationale, confidence and sensitivity Question 10 A delivery-delay indicator crosses a local warning threshold for one day while a logging fault is known. Should a long contract begin immediately? No; verify the signal and use an authorized reversible early action Yes; crossing a threshold removes verification and funding gates Question 11 Does listing an untested backup supplier establish current operational capacity? Yes; a name on a register turns a possibility into delivered service No; lead time, quality and contracting authority need testing Question 12 An adaptation raises crop output but draws additional water from nearby household service. Is its food gain sufficient to declare it best? No; compare food gain with water effect, affected users and resource limits Yes; any crop gain automatically outweighs water impact Question 13 Citywide average access improves after moving a pickup point while a remote area's travel time rises. Is the overall average enough to expand? Yes; an improved average removes subgroup review No; show remote-area harm and test a safeguard or revision before expansion Question 14 An option leads by one point under disputed criterion weights. Is its rank final? No; check eligibility and sensitivity to weights and uncertain ratings Yes; any numeric lead creates a binding automatic decision Question 15 An emergency well may preserve food for a week but reduce later household water reserves. What stop question matters? How much crop rises, without measuring household water? What local withdrawal limit applies, and who stops operation if harm crosses it? Question 16 A technician confirms the fault, but finance must sign the supplier contract. Can the technician sign because they verified first? No; verification authority differs from spending and contract authority Yes; being first to verify transfers contract authority Question 17 Funds cover reserve stock purchase but not cooling or delivery. Is the option fully funded? Yes; paying for stock alone proves the portfolio can operate No; operating costs are part of service readiness and need funding or a smaller scope Question 18 Two suppliers use the same only crossing. Are their capacities independent during its closure? No; the crossing is a common failure requiring another route or buffer Yes; distinct company names establish independent capacity Question 19 A documented travel-time complaint arrives before a store site is fixed. Is a complaint number without an outcome an adequate response? Yes; the complaint number ends its relevance to the decision No; verify the measurement and give a timely reasoned reply with appeal Question 20 A road test ends on day five and a seven-day sequential site approval follows. Is the site ready on day five? No; permission ends at the end of day twelve under continuous-day counting, with other service gates still open Yes; a successful road test cancels site permission Question 21 A box arrives on time but is spoiled. Does it count in timely usable receipt? Yes; timing alone satisfies every service indicator No; usable condition is part of the outcome even if a driver signed Question 22 Recipients rise from eighty to one hundred while eligible requests rise from one hundred to 140. Has the receipt rate improved? No; it falls from eighty percent to about 71.43 percent despite the count gain Yes; twenty more recipients necessarily means a higher rate Question 23 A response meeting starts in ten minutes, but the first household receipt takes three hours. Which time measures service restoration? Ten minutes because a fast meeting proves service restoration Time to verified household receipt, while meeting speed remains a separate administrative measure Question 24 The overall rate passes but the outer-area gap fails the written equity gate. Expand the portfolio unchanged? No; maintain safe bounded service, test a correction and remeasure Yes; the overall pass cancels the equity gate Question 25 Option A projects 120 of 150 receipts, but its shared vehicle is untested during outage. Should the brief report 120 as observed? Yes; a projected calculation proves delivery capacity No; separate forecast from observation and test fleet capacity before expansion Create a free account to mark your answers and save your progress.
