Mandate, risk and scope

Review questions

Mandate, risk and scope

The specialist first asks which authority a text has: international standard, verified local rule or approved institutional procedure. A requirement matrix links each instruction to its trigger and decision owner. Next, assess relationship risk using customer, product, channel and activity factors, with evidence for every rank and a sensitivity interval when a material fact is missing. The score prioritises work; it neither proves crime nor replaces an independent obligation. Choose a control that addresses the actual driver, with a named input, output, operator and operating test. Distinguish an ordinary evidence request from an exception requiring authorised approval. Route urgent signals promptly rather than waiting for routine scoring. Practice comparing consistent time periods, avoiding unsupported blanket exclusion and recording exactly what remains unknown.

Review questions

Test your understanding with these questions. Marking and saved results are available with a free account.

  1. Question 1A specialist has a FATF text, an unverified local circular and approved institutional policy. What starts the decision file?
  2. Question 2Ownership rank is unknown and its weight is 35%. How should it first appear on the risk sheet?
  3. Question 3The case risk is transfers deviating from expected activity. Which control directly addresses it?