Business Analysis Planning and Monitoring · Lesson 3

Plan Business Analysis Governance

3 min read

Lesson objectives

  • Analyze a Plan Business Analysis Governance case and explain why one action is preferable to a plausible alternative.

Plan Business Analysis Governance

Governance sets out who decides, against which criteria, and how a decision is reviewed or changed. It cannot make a vague requirement good, but it can prevent two teams from treating different versions as approved or implementing a change without the right authority. When planning governance, separate three actions that are often conflated: proposing a change, analyzing its impact, and approving it. Someone with expertise may describe the consequences without having authority to accept the cost or alter a commitment.

First classify decisions. Clarifying wording without changing behavior may be delegated to an analyst and subject matter expert. Changing an eligibility rule, delivery date, or use of sensitive information calls for a named authority. Build a decision table with the decision type, proposer, impact analyst, consultees, approver, time limit, and escalation path. If several people appear to approve, specify whether all must agree or whether one merely advises. “The team approves” is insufficient when team members disagree.

Design a traceable change path: describe the request and reason, the affected requirement version, alternatives, the effects of each on value, schedule, cost, risk, and tests, then the decision, reason, and effective date. Do not make the form longer than the decision warrants. A name correction may need a brief record, while a shared service rule needs relationship analysis and formal approval. Keep proposed, approved, and implemented states separate. Approval to investigate is not approval to implement.

Governance also needs a prioritization rule and a way to resolve conflict. If an influential department requests that its requirement move first, do not silently replace value and dependency criteria with rank. An authority may make a choice that differs from the analysis ranking, but the reason and tradeoff should be recorded. Test the governance path before a crisis by asking what happens if a high-impact change arrives one day before release. If the answer is only “They will work it out,” authority and timing are still unclear.

Lesson summary

Apply Plan Business Analysis Governance to a professional case with a reasoned decision and solved exercise.