Reasons for safety management and workplace roles Review questions Review: Reasons for safety management and workplace roles Begin with an observed exposure and harm pathway, then separate prevention, financial evidence and legal conclusions. A near miss may reflect luck rather than control success. State recorded costs and missing data without inventing a total. C155 principles frame duties, while domestic obligations need their own verification. At shared sites a contract phrase cannot allocate every decision: agree traffic stops, isolation, change and handback, naming who has authority at each point. Close an action with a test showing that the harm pathway is interrupted, not a training signature alone.
Review questions Test your understanding with these questions. Marking and saved results are available with a free account.
Question 1 In the packing-roller case, no injury occurred although a hand came close to the roller after the guard was lifted. What is the strongest initial inference? The hazard is gone because no injury resulted. Exposure exists, so stop the present jam-clearing method and check guarding and isolation. Calculate the actual injury cost before making a decision. Repeated jams alone prove a specific local legal breach. Question 2 The workshop record confirms only two hours of downtime; there are no repair invoices or absence data. How should the financial case be presented? Enter all indirect costs as zero because the record omits them. Present a precise estimated total without separating verified costs. State the two hours as a fact, identify possible cost categories, and obtain their data before estimating them. Omit the moral case because the financial case is incomplete. Question 3 Machine protection costs 3000 currency units. Downtime data are incomplete and insurance does not cover every loss. Which financial presentation is most defensible? Deduct expected insurance payments from every assumed loss State a certain payback period from barrier price alone Separate confirmed cost from potential losses and state estimation limits Treat uninsured losses as zero because invoices are absent Question 4 In the spill scenario, the route was isolated and the oil cleaned, but moisture returned at the joint the next day. Which closure decision best separates safety action from any legal assertion? Close the action because cleaning was done, and record an automatic local violation. Keep the route isolated, diagnose and repair the leak, test for recurrence, and check local requirements separately. Reopen the route because the earlier slip caused no injury. Replace the engineering check with a reminder to be careful. Question 5 A worker reports a damaged guard and uses tools as trained. The employer says reporting transfers responsibility for repairing the guard to that worker. What is the response? Yes; reporting is equivalent to assignment of specialist maintenance The worker cooperates and reports; safe-equipment arrangements remain with the responsible duty holder Cooperation duties end after the first report No party has responsibility until an injury occurs Question 6 A contractor replaces a light above a client's vehicle route. The contractor has a training certificate but nobody owns the vehicle stop. What is the first decision? Start because the certificate proves site safety Defer until both parties agree route closure, stop authority and handback Ask the worker to watch trucks while climbing Assume client drivers will choose another route Question 7 Two contractors compete: one supplies an attractive generic policy; the other supplies comparable experience, a work method and verifiable references. Which selection basis is stronger? Verify task-related competence, resources and performance Policy page count without checking implementation Use the lowest price and postpone competence checks Accept any certificate regardless of its scope Create a free account to mark your answers and save your progress.
