Engagement and diagnosis

Review questions

Engagement and diagnosis

A supply-chain diagnosis begins with a bounded decision question, not a preferred remedy. Fix the segment, period, original promise and approval owner, then map order events from acceptance to proof of receipt, separating observed work from unexplained waiting. Every measure needs a numerator, denominator, exclusions and event definition. On-time arrival is not a perfect order: quantity, product, destination, condition and documentation also matter. A missing record remains unknown, so show conditional bounds rather than a false exact result. Once the gap is described, compare promise, inventory, capacity, carrier and logging hypotheses with tests in comparable segments. The module's recommendation is an executable next step proportionate to evidence strength, stating what might reverse it, its cost and the relevant decision right.

Review questions

Test your understanding with these questions. Marking and saved results are available with a free account.

  1. Question 1A sponsor wants to “fix delays.” Orders include domestic standard orders and cross-border custom orders. The service dashboard uses invoice time, while complaints concern customer receipt. Which engagement question should come before proposing a remedy?
  2. Question 2An order was confirmed at 08:00, its label printed at 08:15 and carrier receipt scanned at 16:30. There is no packing-complete timestamp. A manager claims the warehouse lost 8 hours 15 minutes. What is the most defensible conclusion?
  3. Question 3Of 200 orders, 170 are confirmed on time, 15 late and 15 lack proof of receipt. What is the possible on-time rate across all orders without assuming the missing cases' status?
  4. Question 4Lateness rises during a promotion as heavy-item mix increases and a carrier changes in some regions. Which test best distinguishes packing-capacity and carrier explanations?