Frame the innovation opportunity and mandate

Review questions

Frame the innovation opportunity and mandate

Begin with the difference between an unused proposal and a change made available or brought into use. Name the baseline, comparison unit and implementation scope before describing novelty. A room-booking sketch proves no benefit; sending a message to a subset supports bounded availability but not fewer calls. Map the visitor path from finding a room to confirmation, separating observed acts from explanations. Calendar opens cannot stand for unique people when repeat opens are possible. Ask about recent episodes with neutral questions and preserve contrary accounts. State an opportunity with user, job, evidence, desired outcome, guardrail and authority limit rather than a technology name. The library case tests availability-state understanding without changing eligibility. Evidence short of causation can still direct the next test.

Review questions

Test your understanding with these questions. Marking and saved results are available with a free account.

  1. Question 1A scheduling team drew a new booking screen and tested comprehension with five employees. Customers have not seen it and the center has not used it. What description do the facts support now?
  2. Question 2One week has 90 calendar opens and 54 submitted room requests. The log does not separate unique people from repeat opens. What is defensible?
  3. Question 3A specialist wants to learn why a booking was abandoned after 'provisionally available' appeared. Which interview prompt is least leading?
  4. Question 4A team has 64 completed membership applications among 80 starters, and some visitors did not understand a document condition. Which brief supports an initial test without changing eligibility?