Frame a Human-Centred Service Challenge

Review questions

Integrated summary: Frame a Human-Centred Service Challenge

The first subject begins with a familiar situation: a team wants a new app because some visitors returned with missing documents. Separate a person's need from a symptom, an assumption from a solution, and mark the journey and team authority boundaries. Then plan responsible discovery that includes completers and non-completers across channels, and write interview prompts that do not plant a cause. Organize observations in a matrix that distinguishes what happened from what was inferred, testing a competing explanation before framing a problem. Fictional registration and appointment cases require explicit denominators and worked decisions. A changed fact can redirect the intervention without pretending that a small set of interviews represents everyone. Compare access barriers across channels without inferring them from identity labels.

Review questions

Test your understanding with these questions. Marking and saved results are available with a free account.

  1. Question 1A team proposes a new booking app after hearing, ‘I returned because a document was missing.’ What is the sound first research decision?
  2. Question 2In the training sample, 14 of 20 completed registration and five completers asked whether the first meeting was mandatory. Which report is most accurate?
  3. Question 3A researcher needs to test whether a document-field label is understood and proposes saving each participant's identity image in notes. What is the lower-data observation design?
  4. Question 4In six library observations, one visitor found the pickup door closed, while two received a message without pickup hours. How should an analyst group these cases?
  5. Question 5After proof-of-address upload fails, the service offers an office visit as its only fallback. A tester travels two hours and finds that staff cannot resume the request. Does the office's existence make the fallback accessible?