Consultant Preparation Program in Design Thinking and Service Design

Consultant Preparation Program in Design Thinking and Service Design is a free program on ARPS, the Arab Platform for Professional Studies. Learn to diagnose ambiguous service problems, compare design options and write evidence-based advisory recommendations with clear limits, from research through testing and monitoring.

Black sketch Studying is completely free
Estimated time
19 hours
subjects
5
lessons
20
Study language
Arabic and English

Optional certificate fee 50% launch discount

$90 instead of $180

331 AED or 338 SAR

Start the first subject free Fees by route

Program facts

Study fee
Free
subjects
5
lessons
20
Estimated time
19 hours
Content last reviewed
Access period
30 days
Study language
Arabic and English

About the program

A team asks for a new app because visitors return to the counter. Is the cause document requirements, a backstage state handoff or the meaning of a confirmation message? This program uses fictional cases with conflicting evidence and declared figures to turn a requested solution into a decision question. You map a multichannel journey and service blueprint, test rival explanations and compare testable interventions. The modules move from engagement charter and research to system diagnosis, option sensitivity, prototypes and bounded trials, ending with a recommendation memo and measurement plan. Every lesson contains a worked case and a practice task with an observable output and reference solution. You do not need real personal records; teaching cases provide their inputs. The program develops advisory judgment within your actual role. It grants no license or authority to change policy or collect personal data beyond organizational permission. Real implementation requires local privacy, security and policy review by responsible specialists.

Practical relevance

Practice with a charter, evidence ledger, journey map, service blueprint, options matrix, test card and recommendation memo. Named Arab-city settings are expressly fictional and attribute no statistics or rules to those places. Exercises require calculations, interpretation and bounded decisions with solutions for comparison.

Why this program

Teams may turn an initial complaint into a technology project before understanding the journey. Here you appraise sources and denominators, seek a rival explanation and separate wording repair from backstage repair. You learn why option ranking changes when access or time preferences shift and how to stop a trial when it makes a false promise. The output is a decision a service owner can challenge and revise when new evidence appears.

Career relevance

Designed for people leading or advising service improvement across design, operations, research and performance teams. It helps produce a decision case with implementation and follow-up ownership for a service owner. It does not promise a job, external accreditation or authority beyond the learner’s role.

What you will learn

  • Turn a preferred solution into a decision question and rival-hypothesis research plan.
  • Diagnose a journey and blueprint while preserving denominators and evidence limits.
  • Generate options and compare them with access conditions, sensitivity and unintended effects.
  • Test prototypes and bounded operations and record reasons to revise or stop.
  • Write an advisory memo and monitoring scorecard with owners and guardrails.
Learning outcomes (5)
  1. Frame an engagement and research plan that separates service evidence, assumptions and privacy limits.
  2. Diagnose needs, journeys and backstage service dependencies while testing rival failure explanations.
  3. Generate distinct options and compare them through declared criteria, sensitivity and distributed risks.
  4. Design interpretable prototype and operating tests with bounded rollout, failure detection and recovery.
  5. Deliver a conditional advisory memo, measurement scorecard and follow-up plan with owners and review thresholds.

Who it is for

  • Experienced service advisers and team leads with research, operations or experience-design backgrounds who recommend across teams rather than implement one screen.
  • Service managers, researchers and analysts reviewing conflicting evidence and comparing frontstage with backstage interventions while supporting bounded trials.
  • Unsuitable for those seeking a professional license, a fixed technical recipe without research, or permission to collect real user data.

Prerequisites

  • Practical exposure to service delivery, experience design or user research, sufficient to understand a request crossing customer, frontstage and processing teams; no particular software expertise is assumed.
  • Ability to read a small log of starts, completions and contacts, calculate proportions with denominators, and distinguish observation from an assumed cause.
  • Willingness to work on fictional cases, compare options and defend conditional advice while respecting privacy and role authority in real work.

What it does not offer

  • Those seeking an external professional license or legal authority to change a service.
  • Those needing binding individual legal, security or privacy decisions without a qualified specialist.

Curriculum

  1. Subject 1 Open for free

    Framing the advisory engagement

    This module turns a request to buy an app or implement a preferred solution into a decision question with a service boundary and authorized owner.

    4 lessons · 3 hours

    1. Turn a solution request into a decision question 44 min
    2. Plan research across stakeholders 44 min
    3. Appraise evidence quality and conflicts 44 min
    4. Set ethics and privacy boundaries 56 min
  2. Subject 2

    Diagnosing the service experience and system

    This module turns research into a diagnosis of the whole service journey.

    4 lessons · 3 hours

    1. Synthesize needs and reframe the problem 44 min
    2. Map a multichannel journey 44 min
    3. Blueprint frontstage and backstage 44 min
    4. Test rival explanations of failure 56 min
  3. Subject 3

    Developing and comparing options

    This module opens the option space before narrowing it: repair information before entry, repair a backstage handoff, or make state visible after submission.

    4 lessons · 3.5 hours

    1. Generate options without premature fixation 44 min
    2. Test desirability feasibility and viability 44 min
    3. Run a criteria and sensitivity comparison 56 min
    4. Assess tradeoffs and unintended effects 56 min
  4. Subject 4

    Testing concepts and delivery

    This module turns a provisionally preferred option into interpretable test evidence.

    4 lessons · 3 hours

    1. Write hypotheses and prototypes 44 min
    2. Design an interpretable test 44 min
    3. Revise options from test evidence 44 min
    4. Plan transition and service reliability 56 min
  5. Subject 5

    Advisory recommendation and impact

    The final module joins advisory reasoning into a challengeable decision memo.

    4 lessons · 3 hours

    1. Write a challengeable recommendation 44 min
    2. Choose service and guardrail measures 44 min
    3. Govern monitoring and learning 44 min
    4. Integrate and defend an advisory case 56 min

Subjects unlock in sequence as you progress.

Strengths

  • Conditional advisory decisions instead of ready-made interface recipes.
  • Cases with conflicting evidence and handoffs across channels and teams.
  • Exercises with observable outputs, worked solutions and correction criteria.
  • Careful separation of early test findings from broad impact claims.

Evidence basis

Method teaching draws on original materials from Design Council, IDEO, the GOV.UK Service Manual and published Nielsen Norman Group research. These address human-centered exploration, service blueprints, prototyping and measurement. Lesson scenarios and figures are fictional teaching constructions. Institutional guidance stays within its own scope and is not turned into universal law or endorsement of this program.

Reference organizations

  • WHO
  • UNICEF
  • AAMFT
Methodology

Lessons use official sources within the inspected scope and original fictional cases for comparison and analysis.

Assessment

Assessments are aligned to program outcomes and may include module assessments, a final assessment, or a combination, with scenario-based questions where appropriate.

Assessment attempts: 2 per assessment, 7 days apart

The pass mark is announced before the program is published.

Certificate

The credential confirms completion and successful assessment; it does not automatically grant a legal licence to practise as a consultant in a regulated field.

Every certificate has a public verification code. Verify a certificate

The real design with fictional details; opens in a new window.

Verification example: a real issued certificate

Disclaimer: Advisory education for analyzing service design and recommending action within role boundaries; it grants no professional license or authority to change policy or collect data without permission.

Program questions

Does this program grant an advisory license?

No. It teaches service analysis and recommendation within your real authority and grants no external accreditation or legal power.

Must I use real user data?

No. Teaching cases supply inputs. In practice, use authorized data and follow privacy policy.

Is building an app always the right answer?

No. Evidence may point to a document, backstage decision or status meaning; compare mechanisms before investment.

How do I handle missing journey data?

Record the missing segment, keep observed and unknown cases separate, and recommend a small test or authorized data collection before generalizing.

Does a prototype test prove whole-service impact?

No. It supports only the tested task and participants; operating performance and cross-team handoffs need measurement and a bounded trial.

When should the recommendation change?

When a decisive assumption shifts, an access or state harm appears, or stronger evidence arrives; the memo names review thresholds and the decision owner.

Is Consultant Preparation Program in Design Thinking and Service Design free, and do I get a certificate?

Yes. Consultant Preparation Program in Design Thinking and Service Design is free on ARPS: every lesson, exercise and assessment is free, the first subject is open to read without an account, and the program is available in Arabic and English. Issuing a certificate is optional; it is a training completion certificate showing you passed the program's assessments, not a university degree, a professional licence or an endorsement by an external body.

What other names is Consultant Preparation Program in Design Thinking and Service Design known by?

The subject of this program is also known as: design thinking, service design, customer experience design. Learners usually find it by searching for: design thinking course, service design course, design thinking consultant, service design training online, free design thinking course.